logo
Published on National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (http://www.thetaskforce.org)

The right wing lies about federal hate crimes legislation

By Jason Cianciotto
Created 2007-05-01 14:42

Since the federal hate crimes bill (Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2007) was introduced in March, anti-LGBT leaders of the religious right have been spending a lot of time and money spreading lies and misinformation about it, including that it punishes people’s “thoughts” and would lead to the imprisonment of evangelical Christians for sharing their beliefs about LGBT people.

For example, a social research analyst for Focus on the Family claimed [1] that “ultimately, it punishes those who hold politically incorrect thoughts and beliefs about homosexuality.” The Family Research Council has even created a slick online multimedia presentation [2] that warns about “so-called hate crimes laws, which are actually thought crimes laws, and Christians are the primary target.” Janet Folger, president of Faith2Action, has even directed, “Pastors: Act now or prepare for jail.”

Of course, we can always rely on the Rev. Lou Sheldon of the Traditional Values Coalition (TVC) to provide the most egregious lies, including a recent action alert titled “Homosexual/Drag Queen Hate Crimes Bill On Fast Track,” which claimed that the hate crimes law would “fund anti-Christian curriculum for children K-12 through the U.S. Departments of Education and Justice to promote homosexuality and cross-dressing as normal behavior.” TVC also distributed a graphic depicting Jesus on a wanted poster “for violation of the proposed hate crimes law in his teaching and in his book ‘the Bible.’” (The action alert and the graphic have since “expired” and been removed from TVC’s Web site but have been preserved at Pam’s House Blend [3]).

Unfortunately, the religious right has been very successful at distributing lies about LGBT issues without being held accountable by the mainstream media. Let’s take a brief look at what the proposed hate crimes bill would actually do. For a more detailed analysis, the Library of Congress has a summary [4] written by the Congressional Research Service, the non-partisan, public policy research arm of the U.S. Congress.

In short, the bill authorizes the federal government, and directs federal grant money, to assist in the investigation and prosecution of hate crimes. It adds disability, sexual orientation, gender and gender identity to the list of categories under which a hate crime can be prosecuted for “willfully caus[ing] bodily injury to any person or, through the use of fire, a firearm, or an explosive or incendiary device, attempt[ing] to cause bodily injury to any person.” The bill ends the requirement that victims of race-, religion- and national origin-based crimes must have been targeted because they were engaging in a federally protected right, such as voting or attending public school. And finally, it expands the data collection and reporting requirements of the Hate Crimes Statistics Act to include crimes motivated by bias against a victim’s gender or gender identity as well as hate crimes committed by and against juveniles.

Notice what the bill does not do — there is no provision for enhanced sentencing of someone convicted of a hate crime, and there is no provision that limits or criminalizes anyone’s thoughts or speech.

In fact, the House Judiciary Committee added even more First Amendment protections to the bill before it was passed out of committee, with a new provision specifically stating that “nothing in this Act, or the amendments made by this Act, shall be construed to prohibit any expressive conduct protected from legal prohibition by, or any activities protected by the free speech or free exercise clauses of, the First Amendment to the Constitution.”

In other words, not only is the bill limited to acts that willfully cause or attempt to willfully cause bodily injury, it also includes a provision that specifically reinforces the fact that it cannot be used to limit anyone’s, anti-LGBT speech, not even Rev. Lou Sheldon’s.

Despite the intentionally misleading messaging coming from the religious right about federal hate crimes legislation, if this bill passes pastors — and people of any faith, for that matter — will only need to “prepare for jail” if they are actively planning violent attacks against LGBT people.


Want to share your thoughts about Jason Cianciotto’s blog entry?

Send your comments to OutSpoken@theTaskForce.org [4].

Please let us know how your name should appear and, optionally, your city and state. Comments may be posted on our Web site and used in other Task Force materials.



 

Hate crimes legislation

Tuesday, 5/1/2007, 6:33 PM (EST)

Jason...Your article is very helpful...what is the response to legislators who insist “all crimes are hate crimes” and this bill is unnecessary? I live in Florida and I call and write letters to our DC reps....no wonder how our congressmen are voting...

Thanks,
Sandy



More TVC fallacies

Tuesday, 5/1/2007, 10:45 PM (EST)

Making sure you saw this misrepresentation, yet another courtesy of TVC:

http://www.goodasyou.org/good_as_you/2007/05/tvc_the_least_t.html [5]

Another good one was Sheldon lying (on video) about a Clinton-era hate crimes doc:

http://www.goodasyou.org/good_as_you/2007/04/mr_sheldon_your.html [6]

—Jeremy

Jeremy Hooper
Good As You
www.goodasyou.org [7]



Permission to quote

Wednesday, 5/2/2007, 2:08 AM (EST)

Mr. Cianciotto,
By way of introduction, I’m A. G. Casebeer, Lobbying Chair for the National Transgender Advocacy Coalition. NTAC is preparing to lobby May 16–17 on Capitol Hill. It sounds like we’re to be too late for the House HR1592, but the Senate Hate Crimes bill, and ENDA, will probably still be in play. Heady times, indeed.

I would like permission to quote your blog posting, entitled “The right wing lies about federal hate crimes legislation”, in our lobbying materials. It succinctly sums up what these bills will and won’t do, and calls our “friends” in the Religious Reich, on their lies and fabrications. You’ve written this well.

A. G. Casebeer



Wednesday, 5/2/2007, 10:50 AM (EST)

Jason,Thank you for keeping your finger on this particular pulse.It is important,to know that these ignorant evangelicals are doing this yet again.No suprise here.Raised Penticostal myself,I go way back.I am a believer of the constitution,that we are ALL equal,and deserve the same.And to put an end to the killing of innocent GLBT tax payers.Hate is learned and it is deep rooted in organized religion.That is why it is unorganized,they try so hard to exclude,and, that is what they miss, in the bible I read.Thanks for your efforts.Keep on it.God Go.Jerry Okc.Ok.

Jerry
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma



Hate Crimes Legislation does punish thoughts

Thursday, 5/10/2007, 3:41 PM (EST)

That’s the entire problem with this legislation; it’s very political in nature. Just look at the math:

Person A and Person B each commit a violent assault against some 3rd party; equivalent amounts of physical harm and emotional damage are done, let’s say.

This kind of assault is normally punished by a 10 year sentence, given the circumstances.

Person A is tried, convicted, and sentenced to 10 years.

Person B is tried, convicted, and sentenced to 15 years (the additional time because this is classified as a Hate Crime).

Person A got 10 years for the assault.

Person B got 10 years for the assault plus 5 years for displaying unpopular views (i.e., racism, sexism, or whatever it was).

Effectively, Person B is getting 5 years in prison for having politically incorrect views. This is “Thought” Crimes and is unconstitutional in regard to the First Amendment. If we have “Free Speech”, does not “Free Thought” figure in there?

Now, if a city has a problem with gays getting bashed and threatened, perhaps that’s a law enforcement issue and we need more cops or greater police focus, or maybe (God forbid!) an armed citizenry. My concealed handgun license saved me and a loved one from a thrashing one time. It does work you know.

But more legislation, especially Hate “Thought” Crimes legislation, is NOT the answer. We have too many laws as it is, and if we keep creating laws, it’s going to turn back to bite us. I would say we have “law pollution”; too many “feel good” laws.

Thanks.

Sincerely,

W. Mason
Texas